Henke et al v. Wiltel Communications, L.L.C. et al
| Glenn A Henke and Linda Kluner |
| Wiltel Communications, L.L.C., Magellan Pipeline Company, L.P. and Arco Midcon, L.L.C. |
| 4:2010cv00086 |
| January 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Charles |
| Henry E. Autrey |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
216
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. 156], is granted. A separate judgment in accordance with this Opinion, Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. 156 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/5/15. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
155
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification, [Doc. 98], is DENIED. 98 Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 3/12/14. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
154
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Wiltel Communications, L.L.C.s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 81 ], is granted. A separate judgment in accordance with this Opinion, Memorandum andOrder will be entered upon the resolution of the remaining claims herein. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 03/07/2014. (CLK)
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Wiltel Communications, L.L.C.s Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 4], is granted in part and denied in part; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Magellan Pipeline Company, L.P.s Motion to Di smiss, [Doc. No. 15], is granted in part and denied in part; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to file an Amended Complaint, [Doc. No. 19], is granted as to Count VI; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant ARCO Midcon, L.L.Cs Motio n to Dismiss and Strike, [Doc. No. 28], is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count I is dismissed as to Wiltel and Magellan; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count IV is dismissed as to all defendants; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count V is dismissed as t o all defendants, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count VI is dismissed as to all defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are given 14 days from the date of this Opinion to file an Amended Count VI as to Defendant Wiltel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs demand for medicalmonitoring is stricken. 28 15 19 4 ( Response to Court due by 11/16/2010.) Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 11/2/10. (CLA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
