Yang v. McKinney
| Richard Yang |
| William McKinney |
| 4:2010cv00208 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Washington |
| Mary Ann L. Medler |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 70 ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [Doc. 70] is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.95 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 6/13/12. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
63
JUDGMENT IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant WilliamMcKinneys Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 8/25/11. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:ORDERED that defendants Randolph, Sands, and Cofield areDISMISSED from this action. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Randolph, Sands, or Cofield because, as to these defendants, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. An appropriate Order of Partial Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 11/16/10. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.75 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Or der. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceedi ng. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendant shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 2/18/10. (copy of order mailed to Pro-se plaintiff)(TRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yang v. McKinney | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Yang | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: William McKinney | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
