Monsanto Company et al v. Boggs Farm Center, Inc. et al
| Monsanto Company and Monsanto Technology LLC |
| Boggs Farm Center, Inc. and Andrew Max Boggs, Jr. |
| 4:2010cv00286 |
| February 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Adair |
| Henry E. Autrey |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall administrativelyclose this action, subject to reopening on a motion filed in compliance with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any pending motions are denied withoutprejudice to be refiled in the event the case is reopened. 51 Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 3/21/12. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
30
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Andrew Max Boggs Jr.s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #13] is DENIED. Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Monsantos Motion to Strike and Dismiss 19 is granted in part and denied in part. IT IS FURTHE R ORDERED that Monsantos Motion to Strike BFCs Eighth Affirmative Defense is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Monsantos Motion to Strike BFCs Ninth Affirmative Defense is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Monsantos Motion to Dismiss BFCs Counterclaim I is DENIED. 13 19 See Order for further details. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 11/18/2010. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
