Barton Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Cardinal Health, Inc.
Barton Enterprises, Inc. and Barton Pharmacies, Inc. |
Cardinal Health, Inc. |
4:2010cv00324 |
February 24, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
David D. Noce |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STAYING ACTION FOR ARBITRATION For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendant Cardinal Health, Inc. to dismiss, or, in the alternative, to stay the action (Doc. 25) is sustained as follows: a. Fur ther proceedings in this action are stayed pending the outcome of arbitration proceedings involving the claims between Barton Enterprises, Inc. and Cardinal Health, Inc. b. The claims between Barton Pharmacies, Inc. and Cardinal Health, Inc. in this judicial action are not subject to arbitration and are stayed until the resolution of the aforesaid arbitration. In all other respects, the subject motion (Doc. 25) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on or about the first day of each month beginn ing with August 1, 2010, the parties shall file a joint report of the status of the arbitration proceedings, and as soon as practical after the disposition of the arbitration proceedings they shall file with the court a report of same. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 5/27/10. (KXS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.