Dalton v. Painters District Council No. 2 et al
Plaintiff: Lesa Dalton
Defendant: Painters District Council No. 2 and Joseph M. Barrett
Case Number: 4:2010cv01090
Filed: June 17, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Thomas C. Mummert
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 166 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Joseph Barretts motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Doc. No. 157.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Painters District Council No. 2 for summary judgment is DENIED. (Doc. No. 158.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 2/1/2013. (KSM)
June 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 131 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Defendant P.M. Leach Painting, Inc., to dismiss Count V of Plaintiffs Fifth Amended Complaint against it is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 127.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall confer, and on or before June 25, 2012, shall advise the Court (1) whether there is any further need for thesupplemental Rule 16 Conference currently scheduled for July 10, 2012, or if it should becanceled,1 and (2) whether the parties remain prepared to proceed to trial on the current trial setting of July 23, 2012.( Response to Court due by 6/25/2012.) Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/18/12. (JWJ)
January 25, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 107 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the renewed motion filed by Defendants former counsel in this case (Bartley Goffstein, L.L.C., Paul C. Hetterman, and James R. Kimmey, III) for reconsideration of this Courts Memorandum and Order dated A pril 8, 2011, granting Plaintiffs motion to disqualify former counsel as Defendants counsel in this case, is DENIED. (Doc. No. 103.) re: 103 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Movant Bartley Goffstein, L.L.C. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/25/12. (JWJ)
November 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 98 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants motion to dismiss the fourth amended complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent with the above decision. (Doc. No. 70)re: 70 MOTION to Dismiss (Defendants', Painters District Council No. 2 and Joseph M. Barrett, Joint Motion to Dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint) :Fourth Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Painters District Council No. 2 Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 11/10/11. (JWJ)
May 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 72 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants motion for reconsideration of this Courts Memorandum and Order granting motion to disqualify Defendants counsel is DENIED. [Doc. # 65 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have twenty-one (21) days to obtain new counsel. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/23/11. (KJS)
April 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to strike the affidavit of Jeffrey Hartnett is DENIED. [Doc. #58] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to disqualify Defendants'counsel is GRANTED . [Doc. #29] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to file a fourth amended complaint is GRANTED. [Doc. #52] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the third amended complaint is DENIED as moot withou t prejudice to Defendants' right to file such a motion, by incorporation or otherwise, directed to the fourth amended complaint. [Doc. #33] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' motion to stay discovery pending ruling on the motion to dismiss the third amended complaint is DENIED as moot. [Doc. #35] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall have 30 days to have new counsel enter an appearance on their behalf, and 21 days from the date of such entry to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's fourth amended complaint. A new Case Management Order will be entered at that point. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 4/8/2011. (NCL)
July 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants motion for a more definite statement regarding the facts supporting the claims of sexual harassment and gender discrimination is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have up to and including August 12, 2010, to file an amended complaint. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the dismissal without prejudice of some of Plaintiffs claims. re: 7 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Defendant Joseph M. Barrett, Defendant Painters District Council No. 2. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/29/10. (JWJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dalton v. Painters District Council No. 2 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lesa Dalton
Represented By: Lawrence P. Kaplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Painters District Council No. 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph M. Barrett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?