Warren v. Cardoza Publishing, Inc. et al
Ken Warren |
Cardoza Publishing, Inc. and Avery Cardoza |
4:2010cv01353 |
July 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Charles |
Stephen N. Limbaugh |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 25 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Personal Jurisdiction and Venue) filed by Defendant Avery Cardoza, Defendant Cardoza Publishing, Inc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Due to Lack o f Personal Jurisdiction 25 shall be and is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss due to Improper Venue 25 shall be and is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that all of Plaintiff's claims shall be and are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/2/11. (CSG) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : Based upon pltf's application for default judgment by the Court, and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that: 1. Defts' shall pay damages to pltf. for unpaid royalties as outlined in af fidavit of Ken Warren the principal sum of One Million, six hundred forty thousand, eight hundred seventy dollars and no cents ($1,640,870.00). The defts' are jointly and severally liable for these damages.. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 12/7/10. (LGK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.