Smith v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
| Mario Darrell Smith |
| St. Louis County Police Department, Florissant Police Department, Bolin Services, Robert Vogal, Patrick O'Neill, Jason West and Robert Sweeso |
| 4:2010cv01790 |
| September 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Crawford |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall docket this case as Mario Darnell Smith v. St. Louis County Police Departme nt, Florissant Police Department, Bolin Services, Robert Vogal, Patrick O'Neill, Jason West, Unknown Easton, and Robert Sweeso. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint, because th e complaint is legally frivolous and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #4] is DENIED, as moot. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 1/27/2011. (KMS)
|
|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall provide plaintiff with CJA Form 23 (financial affidavit). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00, or to submit a fully completed CJA Form 23 (financial affidavit). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee or to submit a fully completed CJA Form 23 within thirty days, the case shall be dismissed, wi thout prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a fully completed CJA Form 23 within thirty days, the Clerk of Court shall cause this case to be resubmitted to the undersigned for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), (d). (copy of order and a cja 23 form mailed to plaintiff). Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 1/4/2010. (KMS)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall provide plaintiff with the court forms entitled Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Costs and Financial Affidavit - CJA 23. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have t wenty (20) days from the date of this Order to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00, or to submit a fully completed and signed Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Costs and Financial Affidavit - CJA 23. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, with in twenty (20) days from the date of this Order, plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee or fails to submit a fully completed and signed Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Costs and Financial Affidavit - CJA 23, the case shall be dismissed, withou t prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff timely submits a Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Costs and Financial Affidavit - CJA 23, the Clerk shall cause this case to be resubmitted to the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1. (copy of Motion to Proceed without Prepayment of Costs and Financial Affidavit -CJA 23 sent to plaintiff, and copy of this order) Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 12/7/2010. (KMS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
