Suter v. The Carpenter Health and Welfare Trust Fund of St. Louis
Plaintiff: Michael Suter and Candice Suter
Defendant: The Carpenter Health and Welfare Trust Fund of St. Louis
Case Number: 4:2010cv01855
Filed: October 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 OPINION AND MEMORANDUM IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the defendant is reversed and this matter is remanded with instructions to reopen the administrative record and allow plaintiffs an out-of-time appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count I of defendant's Counterclaim is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 9/28/2012. (NCL)
November 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Michael Suter's Motion For Summary Judgment On Defendant's Counterclaim (Docket No. 33) is denied. Denying 33 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 11/3/2011. (NCL)
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's Motion For Reconsideration Or, In The Alternative, For Leave To File An Amended Complaint (Docket No. 22) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's Motion For Leave To Amend Memorandum In Support Of Motion For Reconsideration And Motion To Amend Count II Of The Counterclaim By Interlineation (Docket No. 26) is denied. Denying 22 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 26 Motion for Leave to Amend Memorandum In Support Of Motion For Reconsideration And Motion To Amend Count II Of The Counterclaim. Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 7/22/2011. (NCL)
June 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on the claims plaintiffs raise, Plaintiffs' Motion To Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaims (Docket No. 12), is denied with regard to Count I of defendant's Counterclaim, and granted w ith regard to Count II of defendant's Counterclaim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count II of defendant's Counterclaim is dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Granting in part and denying in part 12 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 6/17/2011. (NCL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suter v. The Carpenter Health and Welfare Trust Fund of St. Louis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Suter
Represented By: Gregory G. Fenlon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candice Suter
Represented By: Gregory G. Fenlon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Carpenter Health and Welfare Trust Fund of St. Louis
Represented By: James E. Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?