King v. Barton et al
Plaintiff: |
Matthew J. King |
Defendant: |
William Barton, Paula Moyers and Scott Jordan |
Case Number: |
4:2010cv02141 |
Filed: |
November 12, 2010 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Office: |
St. Louis Office |
County: |
St. Francois |
Presiding Judge: |
Mary Ann L. Medler |
Nature of Suit: |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
October 8, 2013 |
Filing
132
MEMORANDUM OPINION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant William Barton's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 118) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Scott Jordan's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 119) is DENIED with respect to Count I of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and GRANTED with respect to Count II of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah on 10/8/13. (LGK)
|
July 13, 2011 |
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 11 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Scott Jordan, Defendant Paula Moyers, Defendant William Barton; The court finds that Plaintiff has failed to allege factswhich affirmatively and plausibly suggest that he has a caus e of action against Defendants in their official capacities. Additionally, the court finds, based on the allegations of Plaintiffs Complaint, that Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity in regard to claims against themin their individual capacities. The court finds, therefore, that Defendants Motion to Dismiss should be granted in its entirety. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 7/13/11. (RAK)
|
February 25, 2011 |
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #3] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendant shall reply to plaintiffs claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 2/25/11. (LAH)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?