Doe v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
| John Doe |
| City of St. Louis, Missouri, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Eugene Stubblefield, Susan Singer, Brenda Mallard and Pat Roe 1-5 |
| 4:2010cv02158 |
| November 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
211
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim on Which Relief May be Granted ECF No. 206 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Strike/Summarily Deny Defendants Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternate, Clarify Scheduling Order ECF No. 209 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 4/11/2012. (RAK)
|
|
Filing
180
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine [ECF No. 141] is GRANTED as to the Written Reports, Conclusions and Opinions of Daron Smith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine [ECF No. 141] is DENIED as to the Written Reports, Conclusions and Opinions of Dr. David Prelutsky and Nurse Jeff McManemy. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 4/4/12. (LAH)
|
|
Filing
165
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Amended List of Witnesses [ECF No. 158] is DENIED. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 3/9/12. (LAH)
|
|
Filing
157
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike/Summarily Deny Defendants' Kuhmo Tire Company/Daubert Motion as Untimely, or in the alternative, Clarify Scheduling Order for Response [ECF No. 144] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time [ECF No. 154] is GRANTED.. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 2/29/12. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
119
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Stay or Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF No. 114] is DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Case Management Order issued March 1, 2011 [ECF No. 29 ] and amended on November 7, 2011 [ECF No. 108] is modified as follows: Plaintiffs counsel is ordered to produce Plaintiff for deposition within seven (7) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order, and to make Plaintiffs expert witnesses availa ble for deposition no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. Defendants shall then have seven (7) days to disclose all expert witnesses and provide the reports required by Rule 26(a)(2), Fed. R.Civ.P., and another sev en (7) days hereafter to make expert witnesses available for deposition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that except as modified herein, the provisions of the Case Management Order issued March 1, 2011 remain in full force and effect, particularly Section II, Order Relating to Trial.. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 1/5/12. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
27
PROTECTIVE ORDER re: 26 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by Defendant. GRANTED JCH ORDER TO BE VACATED ON JUNE 7, 2012. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 2/17/11. (CLA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
