Phelps-Roper et al v. St. Charles, Missouri
Plaintiff: Shirley L. Phelps-Roper and Megan Phelps-Roper
Defendant: County of St. Charles, Missouri
Case Number: 4:2010cv02232
Filed: November 30, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Charles
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the preliminary injunction entered in this case is VACATED, and Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs' claims under the federal constitution (Coun ts I and II). (Doc. No. 69.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' state law claims (Counts III and IV) are DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 11/15/2013. (NCL)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 69.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Doc. No. 63.) a separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/20/13. (JWJ)
July 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration is DENIED. [Doc. # 57 ]. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/18/11. (KJS)
March 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to file a second amended complaint is DENIED. [Doc. # 46 ] Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/3/11. (KJS)
January 24, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Amended Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. [Doc. #30] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall not be required to post a bond, at this time, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall confer and advise the Court on or before February 4, 2011, whether they wish to stay the proceedings in this case pending the resolution of related cases by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. Upon receipt of t he parties decision, the Court will set a Rule 16 scheduling conference, as appropriate. re: 30 First MOTION to Amend/Correct 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Megan Phelps-Roper, Plaintiff Shirley L. Phelps-Roper. Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/24/11. (JWJ)
December 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER DENYING A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER and SETTING A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING.......IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED.[Doc. #12] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff s' motion for leave to file a memorandum in excess of the page limitation is GRANTED.[Doc.#7] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for extension of time to respond to plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction is D ENIED as moot. [Doc. #10] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion to expedite consideration of their motion for preliminary injunction is GRANTED. [Doc.#8] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall have to and including December 20, 2010 to file a reply to defendant's response to the motion for a preliminary injunction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing is set on plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction on December 22, 2010 at 9:00 am. Counsel shall no later than December 21, 2010 at 4:30 pm file the following: {see order for complete details}...(Preliminary Injunction Motion Hearing set for 12/22/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 12S before Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig., Response to Court due by 12/21/2010.). Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/17/2010. (MRC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phelps-Roper et al v. St. Charles, Missouri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Represented By: Grant R. Doty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Phelps-Roper
Represented By: Grant R. Doty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of St. Charles, Missouri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?