Howard v. Bank of America, N.A.
| Derrick Howard |
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| 4:2010cv02367 |
| December 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss [# 19 ] is granted, and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time [# 24 ] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion requesting clarification of the Order for payment of filing fees [# 28 ] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions are denied as moot, because this case is dismissed. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 6/2/11. (KLH)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motions for subpoenas [##'s 10,11] are DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for extension of time [#12] is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall pay the initial partial filing fee no later than March 25, 2011. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on January 28, 2011. (MGK)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #1] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $16.67 within thirty (30) days of the date of this O rder. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceed ing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process o r cause process to issue upon the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendant shall reply to plaintiffs claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 12/22/2010. (KMS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Howard v. Bank of America, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Derrick Howard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | James R. Wyrsch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
