BancorpSouth Bank v. Environmental Operations, Inc. et al
| BancorpSouth Bank |
| Geotechnology, Inc., The Clayton Engineering Company, Inc. and Environmental Operations, Inc. |
| 4:2011cv00009 |
| January 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Henry E. Autrey |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
285
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 162 103 107 116 140 134 121 127 109 :ORDERED that Clayton Engineering Company's Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of Paric's Cross-Claim, [Doc. No. 103], is denied; FURTHER ORDERED that Budrovich Excavating, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Environmental Operations Inc.'s Third Party Complaint, [Doc. No. 107], is denied; FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Budrovich Excavating, Inc.' Motion to Dismiss Paric Corporat ion's Third Party Complaint, [Doc. No. 109], is denied; FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counts VI and VII of Paric Corporation's Counterclaim, [Doc. No. 116], is denied; FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Geotechnology , Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of Paric's Cross claim, [Doc. No. 121], is denied; FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant The Clayton Engineering Company's Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of Budrovich's Cross claim, [Doc. No . 127], is denied; FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Count I of Budrovich's Counterclaim, [Doc. No. 134], is denied; FURTHER ORDERED that Geotechnology, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count I of Budrovich's Cross-Claim , [Doc. No. 140], is denied; FURTHER ORDERED that Paric's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff's Third Party Complaint against Budrovich and Paric Corporation, [Doc. No. 162], is denied. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 3/31/14. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
169
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 62 65 66 63 ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counts I, II, III, IV, and VII of the Counterclaim filed by Environmental Operations, Inc., (EOI), [Doc. No. 62], is denied. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff 's Motion to Dismiss Counts V and VI of the Counterclaim filed by EOI, [Doc. No. 63], is DENIED; FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Geotechnology, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of EOI's Cross claim, [Doc. No. 65], is DENIED; FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant The Clayton Engineering Company's Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of EOI's Cross claim, [Doc. No. 66], is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 11/7/12. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant The Clayton Engineering Co.'s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, or in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement, [Doc. No. 20], is granted in part and denie d in part; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Geotechnology, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Counts III, IV and VI, [Doc. No. 24], is granted;IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Environmental Operations, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Counts III, IV and VI, [Doc. No. 26], is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counts III, IV and VI are dismissed. 24 20 26 Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 10/11/11. (CLA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
