DeClue v. Transportation Insurance Company
| Paul DeClue |
| Transportation Insurance Company |
| 4:2011cv00117 |
| January 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| David D. Noce |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
199
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 140 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Third Party Defendant A.I.G. Agency, Inc.; For the reasons stated above, the motion of defendant A.I.G. Agency, Inc. d/b/a Associated Insurance Group for summary judgment against plaintiff Sheri Chipman as assignee of Transportation Insurance Company (Doc. 140 ) is sustained. The action is dismissed with prejudice.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 10/29/13. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
188
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of plaintiff Transportation Insurance Company to substitute Sheri Chipman as plaintiff (Doc. 181 ) is sustained. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant A.I.G. Agency, Inc. to e nforce discovery (Doc. 179 ) is sustained. Plaintiff Sheri Chipman must supplement the computation of damages as set forth herein within 10 days of this order. ( Response to Court due by 9/5/2013.),. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 8/26/13. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of third party defendant A.I.G. Agency, Inc. to compel responses to Interrogatory 8 and Requests for Production 17 and 18 (Doc. 118) is sustained. Unless other wise agreed to by the parties, or subject to further order, this information shall be produced within 14 days of this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of third party defendant A.I.G. Agency, Inc. to compel a response to Request for Production 13 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of third party defendant A.I.G. Agency, Inc. to compel a response to Interrogatory 7 (Doc. 118) is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 3/4/2013. (KMS)
|
|
Filing
150
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of third party defendant A.I.G. Agency, Inc. to vacate or amend (Doc. 135) is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 2/19/2013. (KMS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DeClue v. Transportation Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Transportation Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth R. Goleaner |
| Represented By: | David P. Bub |
| Represented By: | Greta A. Matzen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul DeClue | |
| Represented By: | James M. Dowd |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
