Washington v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District Washington v. United States of America

Washington v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Burl Washington
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	4:2011cv00183
Filed:	January 24, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2014	Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for an extension of time [#37-1, #37-2] is denied in part and denied as moot in part as set out above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel [#37-3] is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 03/31/2014. (CBL)
March 11, 2014	Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Burl Washington's motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [# 1 ] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a certificate of appealab ility, as Washington has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions [# 2 , # 19 , # 30 , # 31 ] are denied. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on March 11, 2014. (BRP)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2014

Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for an extension of time [#37-1, #37-2] is denied in part and denied as moot in part as set out above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel [#37-3] is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 03/31/2014. (CBL)

March 11, 2014

Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Burl Washington's motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [# 1 ] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a certificate of appealab ility, as Washington has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions [# 2 , # 19 , # 30 , # 31 ] are denied. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on March 11, 2014. (BRP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Washington v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Burl Washington
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Tiffany G. Becker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?