Lyles v. Columbia Public Schools District
| Sidney Lyles, III |
| Dawna Mavel, Charles Kiesler, Brady Deaton, John Doe, Jane Doe, Columbia Public Schools District, The Curators of the Univesity of Missouri, Boys and Girls Town of Missouri, Mary A. Laffey, Jack Jensen, Phyllis Chase, Debra Barksdale, Chris Belcher, Daniel Crumly, Candace Whittet and George Russell |
| 4:2011cv00263 |
| February 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Boone |
| Terry I. Adelman |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint as to Plaintiff Sidney Lyles, III. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 5/6/11. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 4 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before May 9, 2011, Plaintiff shall show cause as to why the Court should not dismiss his Title VII claims as time-barred. ( Show Cause Response due by 5/9/2011.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 4/6/11. (KKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
