Gallagher v. City of Clayton et al
| Arthur Gallagher |
| Craig Owens, Patty DeForrest, Thomas J. Byrne, Linda Goldstein and City of Clayton |
| 4:2011cv00392 |
| March 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice. [Doc. 15] The motion is GRANTED as to Count I, Count II, Count III, Count IV, and Count V and DENI ED without prejudice as to Count VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), Count VI of plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for issuance of preliminary injunct ion is DENIED as moot. [Doc. 8] An appropriate judgment and order of dismissal will accompany this memorandum and order. re: 8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Arthur Gallagher, 15 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant Craig Owens, Defendant Linda Goldstein, Defendant Thomas J. Byrne, Defendant Patty DeForrest, Defendant City of Clayton Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 12/9/11. (JWJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
