Bailey v. Doe #2
| David Eugene Bailey |
| Jane Doe #2 |
| 4:2011cv00412 |
| March 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Terry I. Adelman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 16 MOTION to Add Party filed by David Eugene Bailey is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 5/31/11. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint, as the complaint is legally frivolous and/or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. cc: pltff. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 5/18/11. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #5] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff will be allowed to proceed with his lawsuit after payment of the initial partial filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.42 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs request to proceed without paying any portion of the filing fee [Doc. #5] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs failure to timely pay the initial partial filing fee will result in the dismissal of this case. ( Response to Court due by 4/22/2011.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Terry I. Adelman on 3/22/2011. (KMS)
|
|
Filing
2
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Pursuant to the Order issued by Honorable Henry E. Autrey in Cause No. 4:10-CV-2091-HEA, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against Jane Doe #2 are SEVERED from the instant action, because they are not p roperly joined under Rule 20(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of Court is instructed to open a new case, utilizing the complaint submitted here. Pursuant to the Court's Order, only the claims against Jane Doe #2 will be included in this action. The cause has been opened as directed. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on March 4, 2011. (WAF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bailey v. Doe #2 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jane Doe #2 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Eugene Bailey | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
