Mason v. Invision LLC et al
| Harold B. Mason |
| Invision LLC, Timothy McMahon, S. Eric Westacott and Ja'net Morgan |
| 4:2011cv00575 |
| March 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Frederick R. Buckles |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Mason's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and Mason's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Oral Motion for Judgment on Partial Findings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(c) is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 08/14/2014. (CLK)
|
|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff Harold Mason's Corrected Motion For Judgment In Accordance To Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 and Missouri State Rules of Civ. P. 74 (Docket No. 57) is denied. denying 57 Motion for Summary Judgment Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 3/21/2013. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' Motion To Strike Plaintiff's Motion For Judgment In Accordance With Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, And Missouri State Rules of Civ. P. 74 (Docket No. 45) is granted. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that plaintiff Harold B. Mason's Motion For Judgment In Accordance To Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 And Missouri State Rules Of Civ. P. 74 (Docket No. 43) is stricken from the record due to his failure to comply with E.D.Mo. L.R. 4.01(A) and 4.01(E). Striking 43 Pro Se Motion; Granting 45 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 1/4/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -......IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Invision LLC's and Defendant S. Eric Westacott's Motion To Dismiss (Docket No. 22) is denied without prejudice. denying 22 Motion to Dismiss Case Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 3/9/2012. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, as to plaintiff's claims of race discrimination brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the Clerk of Court shall issue process or cause process to issue as to all defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED that plaintiff's claims of age and gender discrimination brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981, as well as his claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Missouri Human Rights Act, Mo. Rev. St. § 213.010, et seq., are DISMIS SED, without prejudice, as to all defendants, because they are legally frivolous and fail to state a claim for relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to dismiss the Sumner Group, Inc., Copying C oncepts, and Data Max as party-defendants [Doc. # 5 ] is DENIED as moot, because these entities were never named as defendants in the caption of the complaint [Doc. # 1 ], and plaintiff did not assert any allegations or claims against them. A separate Order of Partial Claims Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 5/24/11. (TRC)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave toproceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, plaintiff shall submit to the Court a copy of the Missouri Commission on Human Right's notice of right to sue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon receipt of the said notice of right to sue, this action will be submitted to the Court for review of the entire complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). As such, the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to submit a copy of his notice of right to sue within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, his claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act will be dismissed, without prejudice. (Response to Court due by 5/14/2011). Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 4/14/11. (TRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
