Naeem et al v. Metropolitan Taxicab Commission et al
| Raja Naeem and Charles Cole |
| Metropolitan Taxicab Commission, Louis P Hamilton, Dave McNutt, W. Thomas Reeves, Vince Bennett, Berhanu Haile, Basil Rudawsky, Larry Satz, J. Kim Tucci and Central Parking System of Missouri, Inc. |
| 4:2011cv00670 |
| April 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Rodney W. Sippel |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint # 33 is granted, and plaintiffs' proposed amended complaint # 37 is deemed filed as of this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defenda nts motions to dismiss # 22 and # 25 are denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall either withdraw their motion for remand # 31 and # 34 or file a reply brief in support of remand as set out above by Friday, May 27, 2011. If pla intiffs do not comply with this Order, the motion for remand will be deemed abandoned and will be denied without further notice by this Court. In addition, plaintiffs may be subject to sanctions for failure to comply with an Order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion to clarify # 43 is denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 5/25/11. (RAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
