Wills v. Dodson et al
| William John Wills, III |
| John Doe, Christina Dodson, Unknown Storz, Carl Brawley, Jesse Maxie, Cindy Griffith and Andrea Lindquest |
| 4:2011cv01152 |
| June 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Francois |
| Frederick R. Buckles |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims that he was denied his First Amendment right to possession of religious materials and his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process are dismissed without prejudice. With re spect to plaintiff's claims that he was denied his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #38) is GRANTED as to plaintiff's c laims against defendant Cindy Griffith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #38) is GRANTED to the extent plaintiff seeks monetary relief against defendants in their official capacities. IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that, in all other respects, defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #38) is DENIED. Granting in part and Denying in part 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 3/25/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Docket No. 4) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for extension of time to pay the filing fee (Docket No. 9) is DENIED AS MOOT. denying without prejudice 4 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying as moot 9 Motion for Extension Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 9/20/2011. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.70 within thirty(30) da ys of the date of this Order.......IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty(30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants. As identified in the complaint, defendant Lindquest is employed by Correctional Medical Services and defendants Dodson, Storz, Brawley, Maxie an d Griffith are employed by the Missouri Department of Corrections. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 USC § 1997e(g)(2), defendants shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of R ule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall provide the Court with defendant John Doe's proper name and address within sixty(60) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to do so in a timely manner will result in a dismissal of defendant John Doe from this action, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B;Prisoner Standard. granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) for William John Wills, III. Signed by Magistrate Judge Frederick R. Buckles on 8/1/2011. (MRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
