Griffith v. Moore et al
| Robert J. Griffith |
| Jim Moore and Christopher Koster |
| 4:2011cv01153 |
| June 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Ripley |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Robert Griffith for a writ of habeas corpus [#1] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right and this Court will not grant a Certificate of Appealability. A separate judgment in accordance with this Memordanum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on August 12, 2014. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER (jgw). On June 28, 2011, due to an error in electronic case opening, the above styled case was inadvertently assigned a Southeastern Division case number. However, the above referenced case requires an Eastern Division case number. Therefore, t his case must be randomly reassigned an Eastern Division case number. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Southeastern Division case is closed and the case has been reassigned as Eastern Division case number 4:11CV001153TCM and randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert III. Signed by James G. Woodward, Clerk of Court on 6/29/11. (CSG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
