Coleman v. Stubblefield et al
John H. Coleman |
Gene Stubblefield, Shelia R. Troupe, Alisha Goosh and Alex Noel |
4:2011cv01759 |
October 7, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - City |
Henry E. Autrey |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER MEMORANDUM OPINION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs second motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 11] is DENIED as moot. An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 11/16/11. (CLA) |
Filing 3 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pay the $350 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff submits a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also submit a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail plaintiff a copy of the Courts form m otion to proceed in forma pauperis prisoner cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without prejudice.Response to Court due by 11/14/2011. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 10/14/11. cc: copy mailed to petitioner.(CLA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.