Stiriling et al v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
| Jacob Knibb, Jamison Stiriling and Thomas Knibb |
| Unknown Rink, H. Gresham, Unknown St. Louis County Police Officer 1, Unknown St. Louis County Police Officer 2 and St. Louis County |
| 4:2011cv01932 |
| November 7, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Audrey G. Fleissig |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
436
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Jamison Stirilings motion (Doc. No. 407) for monetary sanctions against Defendants for their alleged failure to comply with their continuing duty to disclose copies of certain cell phone record s is DENIED, as the Court has yet to rule on Plaintiff Stirilings motion to compel asserting his right to the records in question. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stirilings motion (Doc. No. 427) for an order of protection barring Defendants use of certain evidence at trial and for sanctions is DENIED as it is based on unsubstantiated information that has been denied by counsel for Defendants. Plaintiff Stiriling is cautioned that the Court may impose monetary sanctionsagainst him in the form of Defendants costs in responding to baseless motions he may file in the future. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 11/5/14. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
414
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER [PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Stirilings motion (Doc. No. 371) to withdraw the motion (Doc. No. 370) for issuance of a subpoena to the Ferguson PoliceDepartment is GRANTED, and the motion for issuance of the subpoena (Doc. No. 370) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Plaintiff Stirilings unopposed motion (Doc. No. 372) filed on August 18, 2004, for issuance of a subpoena directed to the City of Berkeley, Missouri, Police D epartment to produce copies of documents related to any citizen complaints filed against Defendant Robert Rinck while he was a Berkeley police officer is GRANTED to the extent that any such complaints involve the alleged violations of individuals civil rights. ( Response to Court due by 10/24/2014.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/17/14. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
345
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion (Doc. No. 341) for an order allowing Defendant Kathryn Mumford to be deposed by telephone is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendant Mumford shall not be compelled to appear in person for a deposition in St. Louis, Missouri. Plaintiffs may elect to take Mumford's deposition in person in Baltimore, Maryland, or by telephone or videotape. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Jamison Stiriling's motion (Doc. No. 343) to strike Defendants' above motion is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/22/2014. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
232
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before June 26, 2013, Defendants shall file with the Court a status report on the production of the NCIS reports and photographs referenced above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stiriling's motion for sanctions with regard to discovery of NCIS reports is DENIED. (Doc. No. 205.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stiriling's motion to compel Defendants to produce the names of persons who printed NCIS repor ts related to Stiriling and provided the reports to the County Counselor's Office is DENIED, as such information is not relevant to the issues in the present case. (Doc. No. 207.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stiriling's moti on for sanctions with regard to certain photographs is DENIED. (Doc. No. 217.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stiriling's motion to refer a certain law enforcement Defendant to the Department of Justice for an investigation of whether he committed perjury in this case is DENIED. (Doc. No. 225.) (Status Report due by 6/26/2013.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 6/20/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
194
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Stirilings motion to compel Defendants to produce any and all e-mails sent by, to, or from Defendant Herlain Gresham, Lora Mather, and Paul Alexander related to 11931 Roseview Lane, 1 1927 Larimore Road, and 2365 Fair Acres Road, and any photos attached to such e-mails, is GRANTED to the extent set forth herein. (Doc. No. 125.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall immediately make a thorough and complete determinat ion of all sources, including hard copy files and electronic files, and including any and all back-up files, and make a good faith effort to uncover all responsive information in their possession, custody or control. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED tha t on or before May 31, 2013, Defendants shall file a notice with the Court advising of any and all sources from which the requested emails may be retrieved, and shall show cause why they should not be compelled to retrieve and produce said emails from those sources. (Response to Court due by 5/31/2013.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/21/2013. (KSH)
|
|
Filing
185
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date of July 22, 2013, is VACATED, with a new trial date and amended CMO to be entered after the new Defendants have responded to the amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the discover y stay entered on October 25, 2012 (Doc. No. 65), is lifted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 129) filed while the discovery stay was in effect, is DENIED withoutprejudice to refilling by Defendants at a lat er date, consistent with the new CMO to be entered in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stirilings motion to defer consideration of Defendants motion for summary judgment is DENIED as moot. (Doc. No. 137.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/8/13. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
174
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Stirilings motion to exclude the Report 12-44765 and the Child Protective Order is DENIED. (Doc. No. 106.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stirilings motion to exclude any evidence related to alias names used by Stiriling and any evidence related to past criminal convictions of Stiriling and Thomas Knibb is DENIED. (Doc. No. 107.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stirilings motion to exclude Officer Schu e as a defense witness is DENIED. (Doc. No. 110.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motion for sanctions against Plaintiffs Stiriling and Thomas Knibb, dismissing their complaints with prejudice, is DENIED. (Doc. No. 113.)IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stirilings motion to compel any and all documents related to any criminal convictions of Plaintiffs or aliases of Plaintiff Stiriling, and an award of $1000 for the necessity of filing this motion to compel, is GR ANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the motion is granted with respect to production of documents related to Stiriling, and denied in all other respects. (Doc. No. 116.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within seven (7) days of the dat e of entry of this Memorandum and Order, Defendants shall produce to Plaintiff Stiriling all documents in Defendants possession related to Stirilings criminal history and alias names alleged to have been used by Stiriling. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Stirilings amended motion to exclude any evidence related to alias names used by Stiriling and any evidence related to past criminal convictions of Stirling and Thomas Knibb is DENIED. (Doc. No. 117.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at Defendants motion for sanctions and to compel Plaintiffs Stiriling and Thomas Knibb to fully answer discovery requests is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, the motion is granted with respect to compelling answers to interrogator ies by Stiriling and Knibb, and denied in all other respects. (Doc. No. 128.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of the date of entry of this Memorandum and Order, Plaintiffs Stiriling and Thomas Knibb shall fully answer th e interrogatories previously submitted to them by Defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motion for sanctions against Plaintiffs Stiriling and Thomas Knibb, dismissing their complaints with prejudice, is DENIED. (Doc. No. 144.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 4/30/2013. (KSH)
|
|
Filing
170
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants request to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint as a sanction for failing to produce the CD marked as Exhibit A-1 to Plaintiffs complaint is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defenda nts are entitled to the negative inference described above due to Plaintiffs failure to produce the CD in question. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motion to compel discovery of the CD marked as Exhibit A-1 to Plaintiffs complaint is DENIED as moot. (Doc. No. 57.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 4/18/2013. (KSH)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pro se Plaintiff Jamison Stirilings request (Doc. No. 53) for issuance of a subpoena to Captain Doyle of the St. Louis County Police Department is DENIED. The evidence sought by Plaintiff is not relevant to the subject matter of this law suit. See Stockdale v. Stockdale, No. 4:08-CV-1773 CAS, 2009 WL 4030758, at *1 (E.D. Mo. Nov. 18, 2009) (Courts exercising inherent supervisory power over in forma pauperis subpoenas generally consider factors such as the relevance and materiality of the information requested and the necessity of the particular testimony or documents to proving the indigents case.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/25/12. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for temporary restraining order [Doc. #11] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ten (10) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall inform the Court whether there is a need to schedule a hearing on plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction [Doc. #8]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should the parties wish to proceed on plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction [Doc. #8], they shall file, within ten (10) days fro m the date of this Order, a joint proposed scheduling plan setting forth the time period by which the hearing should occur, the issues to be addressed at the hearing, and a schedule for discovery and the filing of briefs related to the motion. re: 11 PRO SE MOTION Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff Jamison Stiriling ( Response to Court due by 11/18/2011.) Signed by Honorable Audrey G. Fleissig on 11/8/11. (JWJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
