Witte v. Culton et al
| Justin Edward Witte |
| Unknown Lee, Lisa Spain, Kevin Weber, Unknown Conrad, Unknown Clubb, Kevin Culton, Willy Forbes, William D. McKinney and Karla House |
| 4:2011cv02036 |
| November 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| DeKalb |
| E. Richard Webber |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
152
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Justin Witte's Request to Retract his Response/Appeal [ECF No. 151 ] is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 09/30/2013. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
146
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants McKinney and Bordeau's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 125 ] is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 09/09/2013. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
143
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Culton's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 123 ] is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on August 30, 2013. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Jason Lee's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on February 21, 2013. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
98
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before December 14, 2012, defendants Kevin Culton, Tammy Bordeau, Jason Lee, and Dr. William McKinney, in their individual capacities, shall file an answer or other res ponsive pleading directed to plaintiff's third amended complaint [ECF No. 97]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as to Kevin Weber and Charles Conrad, the third amended complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for plaintiff's failure to comply with this Court's Order of October 24, 2012 [ECFNo. 94 ]. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). A separate Order of Partial Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 11/15/2012. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave of Court to Amend Prisoner's Civil Rights Complaint Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [ECF No. 87 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plai ntiff shall file an amended complaint, in accordance with the instructions set forth above, no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint or fails to comp ly with the instructions set forth above relating to the filing of the amended complaint, the Court shall dismiss this action without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon the filing of the amended complaint, it will be subject to review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Response to Court due by 11/23/2012.) Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 10/24/2012. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Interlocutory Appeal [ECF No. 85] is DENIED. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on October 10, 2012. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Charles Conrad and Kevin Weber's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 64 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants Charles Conrad and Kevin Weber are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e (a). (Charles Conrad and Kevin Weber terminated.) Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on September 17, 2012. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in their individual capacities only, defendants Kevin Culton, Tammy Bordeau, Charles Conrad, and Kevin Weber, shall file an answer or other responsive pleading directed to plaintiff's second a mended complaint's Eighth Amendment claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this case as Justin Edward Witte v. Kevin Culton, Willy Forbes, William D. McKinney, Tammy Bordeau, Kevin Weber, Charles Conrad, Unknown Clubb , Lisa Spain, and Jason Lee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pending Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 42 ] relating to the First Amended Complaint is DENIED, as moot. Motion for Extension of Time [ECF No. 55 ] is DENIED, as moot. An order directing the dismissal of specific claims and defendants will be filed separately. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on July 13, 2012. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. # 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $89.60 within thirty (3 0) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as set forth in Section A of this Memorandum and Order, supra, the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue on the complaint as to plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims as specified herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint [Doc. # 10 ] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's amended motion requesting service of process [Doc. # 13 ] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B (standard prisoner actions). An order directing the dismissal of specific claims and defendants will be filed separately. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 02/23/2012. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
