Adem v. Jefferson Memorial Hospital Association et al
| Antoine Adem |
| Jefferson Memorial Hospital Association and Warren Mark Breite |
| 4:2011cv02102 |
| December 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Jefferson |
| John A. Ross |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs 50 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/2/13. (LAH)
|
|
Filing
46
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Jefferson Memorial Hospital Association d/b/a Jefferson Regional Medical Center and Warren Mark Breite, M.D.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief can be Granted and for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 17 is GRANTED. Count III of the First Amended Complaint is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim. Because this Court declines to exercise supplem ental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims, Counts I, II, IV and V are dismissed without prejudice to be refiled in state court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Antoine Adem M.D.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 33 is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/13/12. (LAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
