King v. Norman

King v. Norman

Petitioner:	Antoine King
Respondent:	Jeff Norman
Case Number:	4:2012cv00002
Filed:	December 30, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Cole
Presiding Judge:	Frederick R. Buckles
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 12, 2013	Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions of Antoine King for writ of habeas corpus [# 1 , 14 , 22 ] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's moti on to amend his petition by deleting Ground 8 [# 25 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's motion to appoint counsel [# 23 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's motion related to a particular trial exhibit [# 16 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to amend or correct his petition [# 21 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right and this Court will not grant a Certificate of Appealability. A separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 03/12/2013. (CBL)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 12, 2013

Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions of Antoine King for writ of habeas corpus [# 1 , 14 , 22 ] pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's moti on to amend his petition by deleting Ground 8 [# 25 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's motion to appoint counsel [# 23 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner's motion related to a particular trial exhibit [# 16 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion to amend or correct his petition [# 21 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right and this Court will not grant a Certificate of Appealability. A separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 03/12/2013. (CBL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Norman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Antoine King
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Jeff Norman
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?