Steelman v. Delano
Plaintiff: Connie Steelman
Defendant: William J. Delano, III
Case Number: 4:2012cv00134
Filed: January 25, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Dent
Presiding Judge: Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendant for summary judgment [Doc. # 21 ] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's request for costs and attorney's fees [Doc. # 21 ] is denied.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 11/15/12. (KKS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steelman v. Delano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Connie Steelman
Represented By: David A. Weidner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William J. Delano, III
Represented By: James C. Morrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?