Hullverson v. Hullverson et al
| James E. Hullverson, Jr. |
| John E Hullverson, Thomas C Hullverson, Stephen H. Ringkamp, Mark Becker, Thomas Burke and Hullverson Law Firm, The |
| 4:2012cv00144 |
| January 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| John A. Ross |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Protective Order 30 is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff shall desist from any harassing or threatening contact with any witness or potential witness in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that Plaintiffs discovery requests are deemed withdrawn, and the Court grants Plaintiff leave to refile his Requests for Admissions, Requests for Production and any Interrogatories within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Defendants shal l timely respond to Plaintiffs discovery requests within thirty (30) days after being served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other respects, Defendants Motion for Protective Order 30 is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the d eadline for Plaintiff to disclose expert witnesses and reports required by Rule 26(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., shall be extended from December 17, 2012 to January 17, 2013. The deadline for Plaintiff to make expert witnesses available for depositions, an d have depositions completed, shall be extended from January 7, 2013 to February 4, 2013. The deadline for Defendants to disclose expert witnesses and reports shall be extended from January 22, 2013 to February 12, 2013. The deadline for Defendant s to make expert witnesses available for depositions, and have depositions completed, shall be extended from February 8, 2013 to February 25, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will schedule a status conference with counsel to discuss dispositive motion deadlines and the trial setting. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Courts Order referring this case to alternative dispute resolution remains unchanged. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/7/2012. (RAK)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiff's Complaint 16 is GRANTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's allegations concerning purported violations of the Misso uri Rules of Professional Conduct are dismissed and that all references to the Missouri Rules of Professional Conduct are stricken as immaterial from the Lanham Act claims. The following paragraphs and sub-paragraphs of Plaintiff's complaint are ordered stricken in their entirety:...SEE ORDER...IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following language is stricken from other paragraphs and sub-paragraphs of Plaintiff's Complaint:...SEE ORDER... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that as to Plaintiff&# 039;s claims under the Lanham Act, the motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a redacted amended complaint within ten (10) days from the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike or to Disregard Defendants' Untimely Reply 20 is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/3/12. (LGK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
