Lift Truck Lease and Service, Inc. v. Nissan Forklift Corporation, North America
| Lift Truck lease and Service, Inc. |
| Nissan Forklift Corporation, North America |
| 4:2012cv00153 |
| January 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
149
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Nissan Forklift Corporation, North Americas Motion for Bill of Costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Doc. 141 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall tax costs against plaintiff Lift Truck Lease & Service, Inc. in the amount of Eight Thousand Six Hundred Seventeen Dollars and Twenty Cents ($8,617.20). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 12/5/2013. (RAK)
|
|
Filing
148
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - {see Order for complete details}....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Nissan Forklift Corporation, North America's motion for attorney's fees is DENIED. [Doc. 140]. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 12/3/2013. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Nissan Forklift Corporation, North Americas motion to exclude the testimony of plaintiff Lift Truck Lease and Service, Inc., d/b/a A.D. Lift Trucks expert witness Ron Schuster is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DENIED in part as moot; themotion is: GRANTED as to Mr. Schusters opinion that Nissans termination of ADL did not conform to forklift industry custom and practice; DENIED as to Mr. Schusters opinions that (1) ADL substantially ac hieved its sales goals, and (2) Nissan treated ADL differently than similarly situated dealers; andDENIED as moot as to Mr. Schusters opinions concerning (1) the interpretation of any agreement between ADL and Nissan; (2) the interpretation of any Mi ssouri statute; (3) whether or not there was a meeting of the minds as to sales goals; (4) St. Louis market conditions; and (5) the preparation of ADLs sales goals, based on ADLs representation that it will not introduce Mr.Schusters testimony on these issues. [Doc. 66] Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/21/2013. (KSH)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Nissan Forklift Corporation, North Americas Motion to Exclude Testimony of Steve Gula, or, in the Alternative, Motion in Limine is DENIED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice; the motion is DENIE D to the extent it seeks to exclude Mr.Gulas testimony pursuant to Daubert, and DENIED without prejudice to the extent it is a motion in limine concerning Mr. Gulas testimony as a lay opinion witness. [Doc. 68] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Nissan Forkl ift orporation, North America may renew its objections to Mr. Gulas lay opinion testimony in an appropriate motion in limine, which should include its position as to the correct measure of ADLs alleged damages, and must be filed by the deadline established in the Case Management Order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/18/13. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Nissan Forklift Corporation, North Americas motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion is GRANTED as to the claims for violation of the notice provis ions of the Missouri Franchise and Power Equipment Acts in Counts I and III, and DENIED as to the claim for violation of the goodcause termination requirement of the Missouri Power Equipment Act in Count III. [Doc. 67] An appropriate partial judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/12/2013. (KSH)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Nissan Forklift Corporation, North America's motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion is GRANTED as to Count II and DENIED in all other respects. [Doc. 15] An appropriate order of partial dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 9/7/2012. (MRC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
