Borzakovskaia et al v. Scottrade, Inc. et al
Shamin Rabbani, Kamran Khan and Irina Borzakovskaia |
Scottrade, Inc., Rodger Riney, Bruce Rogers, Phyllis Anne Hartrich and Diana Fox |
4:2012cv00214 |
February 8, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Catherine D. Perry |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for extension of time to respond to opposition to motion to amend [# 23 ] is granted only as follows: Plaintiff must file any memorandum responding to t he opposition to amendment no later than May 11, 2012 and must attach to their memorandum their proposed second amended complaint. Plaintiffs' memorandum must address the issues raised in defendants' motion to dismiss the first amended com plaint, and must explain how their proposed second amended complaint cures those alleged defects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall file any response to plaintiffs' filing no later than May 25, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions directed to the original complaint [# 7 and # 16 ] are denied as moot. ( Response to Court due by 5/11/2012.) Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 04/30/2012. (CBL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.