City-County Taxi, Inc. v. Metropolitan Taxicab Commission et al
Plaintiff: City-County Taxi, Inc.
Defendant: St. Louis, Missouri, City of and Metropolitan Taxicab Commission
Case Number: 4:2012cv00408
Filed: March 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: John A. Ross
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 60 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Metropolitan Taxicab Commission motion is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/25/13. (LGK)
May 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Disqualify Defendant's Counsel and Motion for Protective Order to Suspend Discovery Until Ruling on Motion to Disqualify 55 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument 58 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/3/13. (LAH)
February 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Metropolitan Taxicab Commission's Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 28 and Defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri's Motion to Dismiss as to Coun t I of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 31 are GRANTED, and Count I is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri's Motion to Dismiss as to Count II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 31 is GRANTED. Defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri is dismissed without prejudice.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/20/13. (LGK)
June 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Metropolitan Taxicab Commission's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 6 is GRANTED as to Counts I, II and III and Counts I, II and III are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS F URTHER ORDERED that Defendant Metropolitan Taxicab Commission's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 6 is DENIED as to Count IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 12 is GRANTED as to Counts I, II and III and Counts I, II and III are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant City of St. Louis, Missouri's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 12 is DENIED as to Count IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty (20) days of the date of this order Plaintiff shall file and serve his amended complaint as set forth herein. Plaintiff's failure to comply timely with this order will result in dismissal of the complaint without prejudice.. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 6/15/12. (LGK)
May 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument [ECF No. 21] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Metropolitan Taxicab Commission's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint [ECF No. 6] and Def endant City of St. Louis, Missouri's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [ECF No. 12] are set for hearing on June 7, 2012 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 12N. Parties are given thirty (30) minutes for argument. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 5/30/12. (LAH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City-County Taxi, Inc. v. Metropolitan Taxicab Commission et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Louis, Missouri, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Metropolitan Taxicab Commission
Represented By: Brian E. McGovern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City-County Taxi, Inc.
Represented By: Eric E. Vickers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?