Thornton et al v. Mainline Communications, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Bernard Thornton, LeJuan Wiley and Tyrone Cameron
Defendant: Mainline Communications, LLC, Rodger D. Miller and Fransha R. Miller
Case Number: 4:2012cv00479
Filed: March 15, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 155 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees and costs (ECF #33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs are awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $59,649.40 and costs in the amount of $1,278.10 for a total of $60,927.50. A separate Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/19/2016. (JMC)
January 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 151 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment (ECF #147) is GRANTED on plaintiffs' overtime wage claims under the FLSA and MMWL set forth in counts I and III of the second amended complaint. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants on the overtime wage claims. Plaintiffs' claims for quantum meruit and unjust enrichment, counts VI and VII of the second amended complaint, remain pending.IT IS FURTHER HEREBY O RDERED that plaintiffs' motion is granted in part and denied in part on plaintiffs request for damages. Plaintiff Bernard Thornton is awarded damages pursuant to the FLSA in the amount of $9,580.94; plaintiff Lejuan Wiley is awarded damages pursuant to the FLSA in the amount of $33,209.34; plaintiff Tyrone Cameron is awarded damages pursuant to the FLSA in the amount of $7,340.70. Plaintiffs' request for damages outside the two-year statute of limitations is denied. IT I S FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs are granted fourteen days to submit verified documentation in support of their request for attorney's fees and costs. Defendants shall have seven days thereafter to file a response. IT IS FINALLY HEREBY ORDERED that the trial setting on February 1, 2016 is vacated to be rescheduled at a later date. ( Response to Court due by 2/2/2016.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/19/2016. (JMC)
June 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 140 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' joint motion to conditionally certify class and for disclosure of putative class members' names and contact information for notice purposes (ECF #132) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 6/26/2015. (JMC)
September 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 111 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications, LLC's motion for summary judgment (ECF #96) is GRANTED. A separate Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/25/2014. (JMC)
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 93 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss (#42) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, as provided herein. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/27/2013. (JMC)
February 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Count V of the plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint 60 be and is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Charter shall have up to and including February 28, 2013 to file it reply in support of its motion to dismiss 42 . Upon the filing of said reply, the Court will consider the matter ripe for disposition, and will consider all arguments raised in Charter's motion to dismiss 42 as to Counts IV, VI, and VII, and the plaintiffs' response thereto 55 , applicable to the Second Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion to expedite discovery 53 be and is DENIED AS MOOT.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following discovery pla n as to the limited issue of defendants Charter and Fransha Miller's liability under the theory of "joint employer" be implemented as follows: 1) All Phase I discovery (i.e.; discovery limited solely to the issue of "joint employe r") be completed by May 14, 2013; 2) All dispositive motions on the joint employer issue be filed thirty (30) days following the close of Phase I discovery, or June 13, 2013; 3) All responses to any dispositive motions be filed thirty (30) days following the deadline for filing such dispositive motions, orJuly 13, 2013; and 4) All replies in support of dispositive motions be filed twenty-one (21) days following the deadline for filing responses, orAugust 3, 2013. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that any modifications to the above-stated deadlines shall be agreed upon by all parties, in writing, and submitted to the Court for final approval.( Discovery Completion due by 5/14/2013., Dispositive Motions due by 6/13/2013.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 2/26/2013. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thornton et al v. Mainline Communications, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernard Thornton
Represented By: James G. Nowogrocki
Represented By: Richard D. Worth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LeJuan Wiley
Represented By: James G. Nowogrocki
Represented By: Richard D. Worth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyrone Cameron
Represented By: James G. Nowogrocki
Represented By: Richard D. Worth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mainline Communications, LLC
Represented By: David C. Knieriem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rodger D. Miller
Represented By: David C. Knieriem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fransha R. Miller
Represented By: David C. Knieriem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?