Johnson v. Blake et al
Plaintiff: Joseph M. Johnson
Defendant: Alan Blake, Linda Moll, Sujatha Ramesh, Jay Englehart and Dave Hayreh
Case Number: 4:2012cv00510
Filed: March 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Callaway
Presiding Judge: John A. Ross
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 114 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint 109 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall detach and docket Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint which was submitted as an attachment to its motion for leave. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall cause process to issue to Scott Jordan upon the Third Amended Complaint.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/10/15. (LGK)
February 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 104 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents 100 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' objections to Request Nos. 5 and 12 of Plaintiffs Fourth Set of Requests for Pro duction are OVERRULED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that, within seven (7) days of the date of the Order, Defendants shall produce all documents responsive to Plaintiffs Fifth and Twelfth Request in his Fourth Set of Requests for Production. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/17/15. (ARL)
January 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time [ 78 ] is GRANTED. The deadline for filing any response to Defendants motion for summary judgment, filed on January 7, 2014, is extended from February 7, 2014 to May 7, 2014. Any reply brief may be filed no later than May 19, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of Counsel [ 79 ] is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/29/14. (KJS)
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion for Judicial Review 53 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/29/2013. (RAK)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, omitting the Farmington Police report produced by Defendants for the Court's in camera review, Defendants shall produce to Plaintiff no later than Wednesday, May 29, 2013, the Department of Men tal Health Investigative Unit Report, with the names of investigators, unit program supervisors, activity aides, clinical caseworkers, and security aides. The names of those persons civilly committed to the Department of Mental Health, referred t o as "consumers," shall remain redacted to protect their personal privacy, subject to a specific showing of necessity. The Court will destroy the documents submitted for in camera review on Wednesday, June 5, 2013, unless Defendants notify the Court before that date of their intent to retrieve the documents.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/20/13. (LGK)
April 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for In Camera Review 33 is GRANTED. Defendants shall submit the Farmington Police Department report pertaining to incidents occurring on or about February 20, 2012, and the Department of Mental Health Investigative Report issued March 25, 2010, to the Court for its in camera review no later than April 22, 2013.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/15/13. (LGK)
February 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send five (5) blank Subpoena in a Civil Case forms to Plaintiff.2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff submits any subpoenas duces tecum to this Court, he must also sub mit a memorandum which explains as to each subpoena (1) the name of the person or entity he seeks to serve; (2) the specific documents he seeks; (3) how the specified documents are relevant to his case; (4) why he believes the entity or individual subpoenaed has possession of relevant documents; and (5) how he will provide the necessary costs, if any, related to document production. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 2/28/2013. (RAK)
January 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 27 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Joseph M. Johnson, 29 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Plaintiff Joseph M. Johnson motion is BOTH MOTIONS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/22/13. (LGK)
September 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. Doc. # 14 is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/26/12. (ARL)
September 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the second amended complaint as to defendants Alan Blake, Linda Moll, Sujatha Ramesh, Jay Englehart and Dave Hayreh, in their individual cap acities. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants Alan Blake, Linda Moll, Sujatha Ramesh, Jay Englehart and Dave Hayreh shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisio ns of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants Alan Blake, Linda Moll, Sujatha Ramesh, Jay Englehart and Dave Hayreh in their official capacities are subject to dismiss al, without prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. A separate Order of Partial Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/4/12. (LGK)
July 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the amended complaint at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisone r Civil Rights Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit a second amended complaint no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's failure to file an amended c omplaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order in compliance with the instructions set forth above shall result in a dismissal of this action, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #4] is DENIED without prejudice.(NOTE: Courts form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint mailed to Plaintiff) Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 7/27/12. (LAH)
April 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint, on a court-form, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint.. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 4/26/12. (LGK)
April 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit an amended complaint no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. Signed by Honorable John A. Ross on 4/2/12. (LAH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Blake et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph M. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alan Blake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Moll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sujatha Ramesh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jay Englehart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dave Hayreh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?