Bradley v. United States of America

Bradley v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Cory Bradley
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	4:2012cv00556
Filed:	March 21, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Henry E. Autrey
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 4, 2012	Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue as to respondent, because the instant 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movants motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2255 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant is DENIED a certificate ofappealability if he appeals this Order of Dismissal. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 5/4/12. (CLA)
April 24, 2012	Filing 5 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent, because the instant motion appears to be time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant shall show cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not dismiss the instant motion as time-barred. Movants failure to file a show cause response shall result in the denial of the instant motion to vacate and the dismissal of this action as time-barred. Show Cause Response due by 5/24/2012. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 4/24/12. (CLA)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 4, 2012

Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue as to respondent, because the instant 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movants motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 2255 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant is DENIED a certificate ofappealability if he appeals this Order of Dismissal. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 5/4/12. (CLA)

April 24, 2012

Filing 5 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent, because the instant motion appears to be time-barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant shall show cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not dismiss the instant motion as time-barred. Movants failure to file a show cause response shall result in the denial of the instant motion to vacate and the dismissal of this action as time-barred. Show Cause Response due by 5/24/2012. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 4/24/12. (CLA)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bradley v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Thomas J. Mehan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Cory Bradley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?