Gleason v. Northview Village, Inc. et al
| DeVon Darnell Gleason |
| Northview Village, Inc. and Makhlouf Suissa |
| 4:2012cv00769 |
| April 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| David D. Noce |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM - For the reasons stated above, the motion of defendant Northview Village, Inc. (Doc. 32 ) for summary judgment is sustained. The action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 7/24/13. (KJS)
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendants Northview Village, Inc. and Makhlouf Suissa to dismiss plaintiff DeVon Darrell Gleasons count of retaliation (Doc. 11 ) is denied with respect to the allegations of unpaid leave set forth in plaintiffs EEOC charge (Doc. 12 -1). In all other respects, the motion is sustained. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Makhlouf Suissa to dismiss all counts (Doc. 13 ) is sustained. All counts alleged by plaintiff DeVon Darnell Gleason against defendant Makhlouf Suissa are dismissed without prejudice. (Makhlouf Suissa terminated.). Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 8/29/12. (KJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
