Calcaterra v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District Calcaterra v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department

Calcaterra v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department

Plaintiff:	David L. Calcaterra
Defendant:	St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department
Case Number:	4:2012cv00858
Filed:	May 11, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 13, 2012	Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Defendant the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners and its members for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. (Doc. No. 30.) re: 30 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department Board of Police Commissioners Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/13/12. (JWJ)
August 30, 2012	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of the "St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department" to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint as to it is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 11) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintif f shall have 14 days from the date of this Order to file a second amended complaint naming a correct party or parties as Defendant(s). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 16 Conference scheduled for Friday, August 31, 2012 shall be canceled and rescheduled at a later date. (Response to Court due by 9/13/2012.). Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/30/2012. (KSM)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 13, 2012

Filing 40 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of Defendant the St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners and its members for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. (Doc. No. 30.) re: 30 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Defendant St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department Board of Police Commissioners Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/13/12. (JWJ)

August 30, 2012

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of the "St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department" to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint as to it is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 11) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintif f shall have 14 days from the date of this Order to file a second amended complaint naming a correct party or parties as Defendant(s). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rule 16 Conference scheduled for Friday, August 31, 2012 shall be canceled and rescheduled at a later date. (Response to Court due by 9/13/2012.). Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/30/2012. (KSM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calcaterra v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: David L. Calcaterra
Represented By:	David R. Swimmer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?