Schmaltz v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
||O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
||Eric M. Schmaltz
||June 13, 2012
||Missouri Eastern District Court
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - County
||John A. Ross
|Nature of Suit:
||Fair Labor Standards Act
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 10, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Discovery and to Respond to Plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Class Certification 11 is GRANTED as follows: Defendant is granted twenty-one (21) d ays from the date of this Order in which to conduct depositions of Plaintiff and the three affiants identified in Plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Class Certification;Prior to the scheduled depositions of Plaintiff and affiants, Defendant shall p roduce all policy documents that will be presented at said depositions; and Defendant is granted fourteen (14) days following the close of these four depositions to file its response to Plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Class Certification. IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED that the statute of limitations will be tolled for Plaintiffs class as it relates to the claims set out in their Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a scheduling conference pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 is set for November 13, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of the undersigned. An Order Setting Rule 16 Conference will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/10/2012. (RAK)
|March 11, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Class Certification 7 is GRANTED, and the Court conditionally certifies a class of:Any current or former individual who was employed by Defendant as an hourly team member in the United States, including but not limited to assistant store managers, installer service specialists, retail service specialists, parts specialists, and delivery specialists, during the time period from August 28, 2009 to the present da te, and whose time records were modified, changed, or altered by the Defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Supplement Motion for Conditional Class Certification 31 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Exp edite Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Class Certification 32 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Eric M. Schmaltz is conditionally authorized to act as class representative. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Engelmeyer & P ezzani, LLC are authorized to act as class counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant is granted until April 1, 2013, within which to make any written objections to Plaintiff proposed Notice and Consent Form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall provide Plaintiffs attorneys with the names and current or last known mailing addresses of all employees who may be potential plaintiffs in this suit on or before April 15, 2013. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/11/2013. (RAK)
|August 15, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: On August 15, 2014, this matter came before the Court for hearing on the parties' Joint Motion for Final Approval of Collective and Class Action Settlement. (Doc. No. 77 ) The motion was heard and continued for fourteen (14) days, up to and including Friday, August 29, 2014, to allow class counsel the opportunity to supplement the record in accordance with the rulings on the record. Response to Court due by 9/12/2014. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 8/15/14. (ARL)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.