Ewing v. Wallace
Petitioner: Jermaine S. Ewing
Respondent: Ian Wallace
Case Number: 4:2012cv01201
Filed: July 2, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure [#16] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petit ioners notice of appeal must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED pending receipt of petitioners notice of appeal.Dated this 25th day of January, 2013. (Response to Court due by 2/8/2013.). Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/25/2013. (KSM)
January 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners motion to set aside the judgment [Doc. #14] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner will not be allowed to file any additional motions in this closed case. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 1/10/2013. (KSM)
December 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's "Declaration" for relief from his conditions of confinement [Doc. #12] is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to p etitioner a copy of the Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Prisoner Cases. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 12/7/2012. (NCL)
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners motion for change of judge [Doc. #6] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #3] is DENIED AS MOOT as petitioner has paid the $5 filin g fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners application for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motion to admit probative evidence [Doc. #7] is DENIED AS MOOT. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Dated this 28th day of September, 2012. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 9/28/12. (JWJ)
August 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioners motion to disqualify judge [#4] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to both this Courts Local Rule 2.06(A) and Rule 2(d) of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, petition er is required to amend his petition for writ of habeas corpus on a court-provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Memorandum and Order, the Court will dismiss his petition without prejudice. re: 4 MOTION to Disqualify Judge filed by Petitioner Jermaine S. Ewing ( Response to Court due by 9/13/2012.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 8/13/12. (JWJ)
July 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward to petitioner, with a copy of this Memorandum and Order, the form for filing a "Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall complete the form and return it within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon petitioner's filing of the form petition, the C lerk shall resubmit this matter to the Court for review pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to petitioner a copy of the Courts form Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support Habeas Cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to pay the statutory filing fee of $5, or to submit a completed form Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauper is and Affidavit in Support Habeas Cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without prejudice.Dated this 20th day of July, 2012. Response to Court due by 8/20/2012. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/20/2012. (KSM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ewing v. Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jermaine S. Ewing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ian Wallace
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?