Kerry, Inc. v. United Food and Commercial Workers, Local Union 88
Plaintiff: Kerry, Inc.
Defendant: United Food and Commercial Workers, Local Union 88
Counter_defendant: Kerry, Inc.
Counter_claimant: United Food and Commercial Workers, Local Union 88
Case Number: 4:2012cv01277
Filed: July 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: E. Richard Webber
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant United Food and Commercial Workers, Local Union No. 88's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 18 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Union's Countercl aim [ECF No. 5 ] is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Kerry, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 14 ] is GRANTED. The portion of the Arbitration Decision and Award that declared Plaintiff Kerry, Inc.'s post-accident drug testing of Grievant Ron Shook "uncalled for" and "unreasonable" in the absence of evidence of impairment is null and void, as it exceeds the scope of the arbitral issue submitted by the parties, and is VACATED. Furthermore, t hat part of the award reinstating Grievant Ron Shook and awarding him full back bay, less interim earnings and any unemployment compensation received, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the arbitrator shall issue a remedy consistent with his finding that Plaintiff Kerry, Inc.'s action in sending Grievant Ron Shook to Concentra was consistent with the CBA and company policy. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 04/30/2013. (CBL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kerry, Inc. v. United Food and Commercial Workers, Local Union 88
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Kerry, Inc.
Represented By: Gerald P. Greiman
Represented By: Megan D. Meadows
Represented By: Devlin J. Schoop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerry, Inc.
Represented By: Devlin J. Schoop
Represented By: Megan D. Meadows
Represented By: Gerald P. Greiman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Food and Commercial Workers, Local Union 88
Represented By: Gary S. Wolfe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: United Food and Commercial Workers, Local Union 88
Represented By: Gary S. Wolfe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?