Nicholson v. Wallace

Nicholson v. Wallace

Petitioner:	Michael R. Nicholson
Respondent:	Ian Wallace
Case Number:	4:2012cv01325
Filed:	July 24, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Crawford
Presiding Judge:	Thomas C. Mummert
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 5, 2012	Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED AND DISMISSED AS TIME-BARRED. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this action. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 10/5/12. (LAH)
August 13, 2012	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this petition as Michael R. Nicholson v. Ian Wallace. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Doc. # 2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent, because the instant petition appears to be time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause within thi rty (30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not dismiss the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus as time-barred. Petitioner's failure to file a show cause response shall result in the denial of the instant habeas corpus petition and the dismissal of this action. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 8/13/2012. (RAK)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 5, 2012

Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED AND DISMISSED AS TIME-BARRED. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability in this action. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 10/5/12. (LAH)

August 13, 2012

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this petition as Michael R. Nicholson v. Ian Wallace. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis Doc. # 2 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent, because the instant petition appears to be time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause within thi rty (30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not dismiss the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus as time-barred. Petitioner's failure to file a show cause response shall result in the denial of the instant habeas corpus petition and the dismissal of this action. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 8/13/2012. (RAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nicholson v. Wallace
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael R. Nicholson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Ian Wallace
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?