Mooring v. Wallace
Petitioner: Geno Mooring
Respondent: Ian Wallace
Case Number: 4:2012cv01386
Filed: August 2, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Mississippi
Presiding Judge: David D. Noce
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 MEMORANDUM - For the reasons stated above, the petition of Geno Mooring for a writ of habeas corpus is denied. Because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, the court denies a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2). An appropriate Judgment Order is issued herewith.. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 6/24/14. (KKS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mooring v. Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ian Wallace
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Geno Mooring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?