Pruiett v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company et al
| Lamarcus Pruiett |
| The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 4:2012cv01813 |
| October 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Shirley P. Mensah |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to dismiss without prejudice Doc. 14 is GRANTED. A separate order of dismissal is entered this same date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event Plaintiff re-files this same cause of action against P&G, whether in state or federal court, Plaintiff shall pay P&G the costs and reasonable attorneys fees it incurred in the instant cause of action, except for any expenses for work that can be used in the subsequent litigation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within ten (10) days of Plaintiffs re-filing this same cause of action against P&G, P&G shall file with this Court a statement of costs and reasonable attorneys fees for which it seeks reimbursement. This Court will then determine the amount of reasonable fees and costs to be awarded. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shirley P. Mensah on 4/3/2013. (RAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
