Jones v. Slay et al
Plaintiff: Stephen Jones
Defendant: Francis Slay, Bettye Battle-Turner, Richard Gray, Jerome Lee, Irwin Thomas, Vincent Carr and Shell Sharp
Case Number: 4:2012cv02109
Filed: November 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Adair
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 312 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Slay, Battle-Turner, Gray, Lee and Irwin's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 200] An appropriate partial judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 12/2/2014. (MRC)
November 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 264 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - {see Order for complete details}....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Carr's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DENIED in part as moot: [Doc. 196]....IT IS FURTHER ORDERE D that defendant Sharp's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DENIED in part as moot: [Doc. 193]...An appropriate partial judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/18/2014. (MRC)
June 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 206 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motions in limine to exclude the testimony of plaintiffs expert witness Dr. Angela Wingo, Ph.D., are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth above. [Docs. 154, 156 and 159] in Jones v. Slay, 4:12-CV-2109 CAS; [Docs. 86, 88] in Holmes v. Slay, 4:12-CV-2333 HEA; and [Docs. 54, 56] in Cox v. Slay, 4:13-CV-427 CAS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pretrial consolidation of these actions is now terminated. All future filings shall bear t he appropriate individual case caption and be filed in the separate case to which they pertain. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall docket this Order in Jones v. Slay, 4:12-CV-2109 CAS; Holmes v. Slay, 4:12-CV-2333 HEA; and Cox v. Slay, 4:13-CV-427 CAS.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/20/14. (JWJ)
November 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 96 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Slay, Battle-Turner, Gray, Lee and Irwin's Motion to Dismiss Counts V, VI and VII of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is GRANTED, and Counts V, VI and VII will be DISMISSED as to these defendants. [Doc. 69] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Sharp's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. [Doc. 64] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Carr's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. [Doc. 72] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat defendant Sharp shall file his Answer to Counts I and VII of the Amended Complaint within the time permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rule 12(a)(4)(A), Fed. R. Civ. P. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Carr shall file his Answer to the Amended Complaint within the time permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rule 12(a)(4)(A), Fed. R. Civ. P. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/7/2013. (NCL)
April 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court will conduct a hearing on the parties' Joint Motion to Consolidate for Pre-Trial Purposes on Tuesday, April 30, 2013, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 3-North. All cou nsel in the three cases shall appear at the hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer to prepare a joint proposed global scheduling order for management of pretrial discovery and initial motions in the proposed cons olidated cases, and file it in this case no later than 12:00 noon on Monday, April 29, 2013. Motion Hearing set for 4/30/2013 01:00 PM in Courtroom 3N before District Judge Charles A. Shaw. Response to Court due by 4/29/2013. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/24/2013. (NCL)
April 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Carr's Motion to Set Aside Default is GRANTED. [Doc. 47] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Carr shall file his Answer or other response to the Amended Complaint within the time allowed by Rule 15(a)(3), Fed. R. Civ. P. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Carr shall file any response to the pending, unopposed Joint Motion to Consolidate for Pre-Trial Purposes (Doc. 42) by April 19, 2013. (Response to Court due by 4/19/2013.) Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/16/2013. (NCL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Slay et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephen Jones
Represented By: Richard K. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Francis Slay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bettye Battle-Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Gray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jerome Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Irwin Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vincent Carr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shell Sharp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?