Jones v. Slay et al
| Stephen Jones |
| Francis Slay, Bettye Battle-Turner, Richard Gray, Jerome Lee, Irwin Thomas, Vincent Carr and Shell Sharp |
| 4:2012cv02109 |
| November 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Adair |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
312
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -.....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Slay, Battle-Turner, Gray, Lee and Irwin's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 200] An appropriate partial judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 12/2/2014. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
264
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - {see Order for complete details}....IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Carr's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DENIED in part as moot: [Doc. 196]....IT IS FURTHER ORDERE D that defendant Sharp's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part, and DENIED in part as moot: [Doc. 193]...An appropriate partial judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/18/2014. (MRC)
|
|
Filing
206
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motions in limine to exclude the testimony of plaintiffs expert witness Dr. Angela Wingo, Ph.D., are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth above. [Docs. 154, 156 and 159] in Jones v. Slay, 4:12-CV-2109 CAS; [Docs. 86, 88] in Holmes v. Slay, 4:12-CV-2333 HEA; and [Docs. 54, 56] in Cox v. Slay, 4:13-CV-427 CAS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the pretrial consolidation of these actions is now terminated. All future filings shall bear t he appropriate individual case caption and be filed in the separate case to which they pertain. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall docket this Order in Jones v. Slay, 4:12-CV-2109 CAS; Holmes v. Slay, 4:12-CV-2333 HEA; and Cox v. Slay, 4:13-CV-427 CAS.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/20/14. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Slay, Battle-Turner, Gray, Lee and Irwin's Motion to Dismiss Counts V, VI and VII of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is GRANTED, and Counts V, VI and VII will be DISMISSED as to these defendants. [Doc. 69] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Sharp's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. [Doc. 64] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Carr's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. [Doc. 72] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat defendant Sharp shall file his Answer to Counts I and VII of the Amended Complaint within the time permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rule 12(a)(4)(A), Fed. R. Civ. P. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Carr shall file his Answer to the Amended Complaint within the time permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rule 12(a)(4)(A), Fed. R. Civ. P. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/7/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
63
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court will conduct a hearing on the parties' Joint Motion to Consolidate for Pre-Trial Purposes on Tuesday, April 30, 2013, at 1:00 p.m. in Courtroom 3-North. All cou nsel in the three cases shall appear at the hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer to prepare a joint proposed global scheduling order for management of pretrial discovery and initial motions in the proposed cons olidated cases, and file it in this case no later than 12:00 noon on Monday, April 29, 2013. Motion Hearing set for 4/30/2013 01:00 PM in Courtroom 3N before District Judge Charles A. Shaw. Response to Court due by 4/29/2013. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/24/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
59
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Carr's Motion to Set Aside Default is GRANTED. [Doc. 47] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Carr shall file his Answer or other response to the Amended Complaint within the time allowed by Rule 15(a)(3), Fed. R. Civ. P. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Carr shall file any response to the pending, unopposed Joint Motion to Consolidate for Pre-Trial Purposes (Doc. 42) by April 19, 2013. (Response to Court due by 4/19/2013.) Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 4/16/2013. (NCL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
