Conway v. Portfolio Recovery Group, LLC.
| Crystal Conway |
| Portfolio Recovery Group, LLC. |
| 4:2012cv02244 |
| December 4, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Charles |
| E. Richard Webber |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshal Service shall seize the body of Daniel Olcott, President, Portfolio Recovery Group, LLC, pursuant to the Order and Writ of Body Attachment [#43] issued by this Court on March 13, 2014. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on March 24, 2014. (Three certified copies hand delivered to USMS this date.)(MCB)
|
|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Crystal Conway's Motion for Order to Show Cause [ECF No. 35 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Daniel Olcott, individually and in his capacity as the President of Port folio Recovery Group, LLC, shall, within seven days of the filing of this Order, show cause why the Court should not adjudge Defendants in contempt of Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to comply will result in (1) an order adjudging Defen dants Daniel Olcott and Portofolio Recovery Group, LLC, in contempt of Court, (2) the issuance of a Form AO442 directed to Defendant Daniel Olcott, (3) the imposition of fines up to $1,000.00 for every day Defendants fail to comply with this Court's Memorandum and Order dated December 20, 2013 [ECF No. 33], commencing at the issuance of this Memorandum and Order, (4) the issuance of such further orders as the nature of the case may require and as the Court may deem just and proper to compel compliance with the Court's orders, and (5) the imposition upon Defendants of attorneys' fees and costs for enforcement of the judgment. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on February 4, 2014. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Crystal Conway's Motion to Compel Responses to Post-Judgment Discovery [ECF No. 32 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Portfolio Recovery Group, L LC and Daniel Olcott shall, within seven days of the filing of this Order, pay the Judgment of $7,962.00 in full or respond to Plaintiff's post-judgment discovery. Failure to comply will likely result in an order of contempt. Signed by District Judge E. Richard Webber on 12/20/2013. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Conway v. Portfolio Recovery Group, LLC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Crystal Conway | |
| Represented By: | Larry P. Smith |
| Represented By: | David M. Marco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Portfolio Recovery Group, LLC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
