Stiriling et al v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
| Thomas Knibb and Jamison Stiriling |
| St. Louis County Police Department, Robert Rinck, Steven Schue, John Doe Police Officer 1, John Doe Police Officer 2, John Doe Police Officer 3, John Doe Police Officer 4, John Doe Police Officer 6, John Doe Police Officer 5, John Doe Police Officer 7 and Robert Fox, Jr. |
| 4:2012cv02279 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER--IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 01/22/2013. (CLK)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motions to proceed in forma pauperis [Docs. 2-3] are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint no later than thirty days from the date of this Memorandum a nd Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiffs fail to timely file an amended complaint, the Court may dismiss this action without further proceedings. 3 2 ( Response to Court due by 1/13/2013.) Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 12/13/12. (CLA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
