Purzel Video GMBH v. Does 1-91

Plaintiff:	Purzel Video GMBH
Defendant:	Does 1-91
Case Number:	4:2012cv02292
Filed:	December 11, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Adair
Presiding Judge:	Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit:	Copyright
Cause of Action:	17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 6, 2013	Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that those Defendants Doe #2 through Doe #91 who are still in the action are SEVERED from this action and the claims against them are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defe ndant Doe #33's motion to quash or modify subpoena, Defendant Doe #59's motion to contest subpoena, and Defendant Doe #12's motion to dismiss are DENIED as moot. (Doc. Nos. 12, 13, and 30) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff&#0 39;s motion for an extension of time to serve the complaint is GRANTED with regard to Defendant Doe #1, to the extent that Plaintiff shall have 60 days from the date of this Order to serve Defendant Doe #1. (Doc. No. 26.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 9/6/2013. (NCL)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 6, 2013

Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that those Defendants Doe #2 through Doe #91 who are still in the action are SEVERED from this action and the claims against them are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defe ndant Doe #33's motion to quash or modify subpoena, Defendant Doe #59's motion to contest subpoena, and Defendant Doe #12's motion to dismiss are DENIED as moot. (Doc. Nos. 12, 13, and 30) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff&#0 39;s motion for an extension of time to serve the complaint is GRANTED with regard to Defendant Doe #1, to the extent that Plaintiff shall have 60 days from the date of this Order to serve Defendant Doe #1. (Doc. No. 26.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 9/6/2013. (NCL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Purzel Video GMBH v. Does 1-91
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Purzel Video GMBH
Represented By:	Paul A. Lesko
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-91
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?