Adolph & Ceresia Produce Co., Inc. v. Pellegrini Produce, LLC et al
| Adolph & Ceresia Produce Co., Inc. |
| Curtis, Heinz, Garrett & O'Keefe, Raymond Heath, Pellegrini Produce, LLC and Malik Fazio |
| 4:2012cv02334 |
| December 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Adair |
| Shirley P. Mensah |
| Agriculture Acts |
| 07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for default judgment is GRANTED. [Doc. 23] An appropriate judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. re: 23 MOTION for Default Judgment filed by Plaintiff Adolph & Ceresia Produce Co., Inc. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 2/25/14. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants Pelligrini Produce, LLC, Malik Fazio and Raymond Heath is DENIED as moot, as a second motion for default judgment against these parties was fil ed. Doc. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum in support of its motion for default judgment, as stated above, by February 24, 2014. Plaintiffs failure to respond timely to this order will result in the waiver of its claim to prejudgment interest. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 2/14/2014. (RAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
