Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Crossroads Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Crossroads Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. and Sharon Lynn Wilson |
| 4:2012cv02403 |
| December 31, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Francois |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 28 ORDERED that Defendant Sharon Lynn Wilson's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Joe Hand's claims against her are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. An appropriate Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 3/10/14. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted until Friday, May 3, 2013, to file an amended complaint in accordance with the foregoing.IT IS FURTH ER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Prayer for Attorneys Fees in Count III for Conversion and for Investigative Costs (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part in accordance with the foregoing. 10 ( Response to Court due by 5/3/2013.) Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 4/25/13. (CLA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
