Pick v. DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
Plaintiff: Heather Pick
Defendant: DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
Case Number: 4:2013cv00051
Filed: January 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Nannette A. Baker
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER:IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Conditional Collective Action Certification ECF No. 15 and the Joint Stipulation to Conditional Certification of the FLSA Class Under 29 U.S.C. §216 (b) ECF No. 18 are GR ANTED. The Court conditionally certifies a class of all current and former Processors and Client Relations Managers who are or were employed by DAS Acquisition Company, LLC at any time during the past three (3) years. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pla intiff Heather Pick is authorized to act as the conditional class representative. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Rowdy Meeks Legal Group, LLC is authorized to act as class counsel. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the notice filed as ECF No. 18-1, the exhibit to the Joint Stipulation to Conditional Certification of the FLSA Class Under 29 U.S.C. §216(b), shall serve as notice in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall provide Plaintiffs attorneys with the names, addresses, da tes of employment, job title, branch location and phone numbers for all individuals who are to receive this notice or before June 13, 2013. Notice will not be sent to any individuals who have already consented to join this lawsuit. IT IS FURTHER O RDERED that notice will be posted conspicuously in each USA Mortgage Branch location and mailed by first-class regular mail. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §§216, 256, individuals who timely return a Consent to Join form will be joined as opt-in plaintiffs upon the filing of their Consent with the Court. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the notice will be mailed and posted no later than June 20, 2013. Counsel for Plaintiff will notify counsel for Defendant with the date on which the notice will be sent so the notice can be posted on the same date. To participate in the lawsuit and be a member of the conditionally certified class, the Consent to Join form must be returned to Plaintiffs counsel or postmarked on or before the expiration of sixty (60) days following the date the notice is posted and mailed. Counsel for Plaintiff will pay for the initial cost of printing and sending the notice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/10/2013. (RAK)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pick v. DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Pick
Represented By: Tracey F. George
Represented By: Rowdy B. Meeks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAS Acquisition Company, LLC
Represented By: Josef S. Glynias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?